What educational reform? | Selangor Times
Issue 118


What educational reform?
Writer: Lee Hwok Aun
Published: Fri, 17 Feb 2012

You might think, as we get closer to the promised reforms to the University and University Colleges Act (UUCA), that public authorities and education institutions would want to show some change of heart and mind. Think again.

On New Year’s Day, instead of peacefully overseeing a student sit-in at Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) until the crack of dawn, the police chose to crack it down. The students gathered at the university gates to cry academic freedom. The gatekeepers are mad.

We are now caught up in the mayhem of that moment and mutual accusation between students and police. Who provoked? Who pushed first? Was there excessive force? These questions, we can only hope, will be settled without fear or favour.

What we cannot let pass is the dismal failure in the first place to reform authorities’ mindsets. If we are interested in true, 21st century reform, the foremost role of the police and education institutions in these situations is to preserve the students’ rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression.

The police have no business dictating how long students should gather at their own campus, or what time young people should go to bed on New Year’s eve. If students want to camp out till the break of day, deploy fewer personnel in shifts. Apply wisdom before using discretionary power. You can get through the night. It’s not that hard.

But the police flashed the same old thunder: “You got fifteen minutes. Make your point and disperse. Or we will charge.”

So what is this talk of tertiary education reform? We can alter the law, but as long as mentalities do not change, desires to control will continue to find ways to suppress yearnings for freedom.

UPSI has just suspended student leader Adam Adli for three semesters.

Adam was at the New Year’s Day convocation. On Dec 17, he and a group of students lowered a flag with Prime Minister’s face outside UMNO headquarters in PWTC and replaced it with a banner calling for academic freedom. After a minute or so, they returned the premier’s flag to its original place.

For that, this young man is prohibited for 18 months from pursuing a degree in Teaching of English as a Second Language.

We should be proud of passionate, articulate, intrepid, and yes, even brazen young people like Adam. Their activism bodes well for well-rounded education of future generations.

So what is this talk of tertiary education reform?

Deputy Minister of Higher Education Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah has consistently and sincerely advocated greater academic freedom. Kudos to him; he clearly wants to get on with the 21st century.

Sadly, I cannot see any broad change of mindset leading up to the UUCA amendments.

The Ministry set up a committee to seek public opinions and make recommendations. They conducted a survey, filled with loaded, aggressive, and jaw-droppingly stupid questions.

Consider this multiple choice question: students that are too active in external politics must be subject to disciplinary action including ‘expulsion’ if they do not comply with UUCA amendments. (a) Agree, (b) Disagree or (c) Not sure?

First, calm down, isn’t this supposed to be an objective survey? Second, how can one answer without knowing what are these amendments?

Or this: students found to be active in politics but not so brilliant in their studies can be punished by the university authorities. (a) Agree, (b) Disagree or (c) Not sure?

Why this presumption that political activism must be at odds with academic performance? Some students are active politically and do well academically (in terms of grades), some are active and do not score highly, and some are not active and do not necessarily shine, and so on. Students get top grades for a variety of reasons.

We ought to regard them as mature young adults who are free to make their own decisions (and mistakes) take responsibility over the consequences.

If a student is active in politics and does not ace the exam, that’s his choice. Maybe he will not get a job he applies for, maybe she will be appreciated for having ideals and enthusiasm. Who knows? The only certainty should be that authorities have no basis or right to meddle in how students choose to invest their energy.

I must emphasize that it’s not just about student membership and involvement with political parties, which affects a minority. The obsession over controlling students is more regressive to education because it is more pervasive.

The 2009 UUCA amendments did specify some spaces in which students can be free to think and express their views without getting the Vice Chancellor’s permission. But again, some idiotic clauses were added.

For example, students cannot be prohibited from making a statement on an academic issue as long as it is within their field of study or research. Thus, a sociology student cannot comment on climate change, an engineering student cannot express an opinion on democracy.

Please la, stop being control freaks. And grow up.


 Selangor Times



Also by Lee Hwok Aun:

Voting by manifesto

I REALLY want to compare two election manifestos, but as I write only one exists.

The bounteous taking before generous giving

Sunnier days for workers?

Guarantee or speculation?

COME Dec 31, if Planet Earth continues orbiting the sun and twirling on its axis, 2012 will run its full term.

Dr Syed Husin – Justice For All

Don’t address him YB. If there is one who deserves to be honoured by us the rakyat, it’s him. But Dr Syed Husin Ali prefers not to be called Yang Berhormat, especially outside of the parliamentary chambers where he is Senator. You will not find a whiff of false modesty in his words. 

Education blueprint falls short

At last, some official confession of how bad things really are in our schools. 

Janji Dinanti

My secondary schoolmates gathered recently for a reunion. Many of us hadn’t met in 20 years, and in some cases couldn’t match names to faces.

Poser over NEP exit

Are we ready to exit the New Economic Policy?

Stop bullying tactics

Is Vision 2020 delusionary?

Looks like Vision 2020 is riding back into the limelight. With elections around the corner, as they have been for about a year, and destiny’s date now just eight years away, UMNO-BN fires a cocktail canister of pleas: so little time, so much to do, and only they will get us there, only they know how. It almost brings tears to my eyes, tears of…

Good conduct Bill for MPs?

Let’s say we table a Members of Parliament Proper Conduct Bill, and inserted sub-section 15(4) of the current Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) Amendment Bill. Why not? Both are institutions meant to pursue truth and generate debate.

Minimum wage still in infancy

It looks like we are rather conscious these days of lowly incomes and lofty inequalities.

Why settle for minimum wage?

THE lowest- paid workers in Selangor’s state agencies stand to gain from a wage boost next year. The state government’s recently announced RM1,500 minimum wage moves us in a fair and progressive direction.

Landing softly, hardly taking off

So the teaching of maths and science in English, and acronym of the year PPSMI, has been piloted to a soft landing. There’s a bit for all interested parties in the final give and take.

Malaysia should focus on education

2011 will have to go down as the year of the occupied square. The Occupy Wall Street month-long encampment at Zuccotti Park in Manhattan follows a motif painted from Tunis’ Kasbah Square to Cairo’s Tahrir Square, among the more epic places of revolutionary gathering.

Subversion and division

A subversive document lies before me. Brazenly, some Malaysians think “only those countries that undertook a systematic programme to transform the underlying structure of their economies … were able to rise from middle-income status to become high-income countries”. And these people say we should do likewise.

Whither BN’s logic?

When Nick Leeson, the infamous rogue trader, was convicted in 1995, his lines of defensce did not include “I lost money, how could I have committed fraud?” When professional cyclist Bernard Kohl was found guilty of doping in the Tour de France, he did not plead: “I didn’t win the race, how could I have cheated?”

Wither minimum wage bill?

In my last column I wrote about our rush to meet grandiose targets and end up with partial or delusional solutions. Right on cue, Datuk Seri Idris Jala disclosed on April 26 that Pemandu is expecting do deliver a modus operandi and quantum of minimum wage by the end of this year.

Country in a hurry

We are a country in a hurry: we want high-income status by 2020. We are also a KPI-driven nation: we speedily devise and monitor a litany of key performance indicators. And we are an ambitious lot: we set high targets and want fast results.

Malaysia’s "Me, too!" mentality

Murderously deforested Sarawak goes to their state polls soon. The world remains transfixed on the frenzy to cool down Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power plants. And the Malaysian government refuses to impose a moratorium on its plans for nuclear energy.

The right answers or the right questions?

Did you hear a collective groan last week, emitting from the likes of Pantai Dalam, Serdang and Bangi? It's back to the semester grind for students at Universiti Malaya, Universiti Putra, Universiti Kebangsaan, and Malaysia's public universities and their now synchronised calendars.











From Windows to a Mac: A guide




In for a sweet treat




A Majestic presence





Copyright © 2018 Selangor Times. All rights reserved. Designed By Senedi